Thanks for the insight and information…seems that I would have been premature to decide that ACDsee (seemed to?) fit the bill as LR for its DAM replacement. Most tools will not search there for keyword information, because AcdSee does not have Lightroom’s market share. Acdsee places its hierarchical keywords in XMP in a private tag like acdsee:subject (or similar, can’t remember exactly).
Acdsee for mac 4 trial, extend time software#
This can be understood by every serious DAM software and even PhotoLab imports from there. The most common tag name is lr:hierarchicalSubject, lr like Lightroom. For hierarchical keywords in XMPs different tools use different XML tag names and hierarchy level delimiters like < or |. Categories are read directly from the LR catalog/database and are converted into Acdsee categories, which is tool specific.
The problem is mainly with categories and hierarchical keywords. This is dangerous, if you want to move away from AcdSee some day. Everyone understands the Lightroom language, everyone offers an import from a Lightroom catalog or Lightroom produced XMPs, but you will search very long for a tool, that wants to import from AcdSee. That it might be structurally similar/same? Star-based ratings will be converted to a 1-5 rating system.To import a database, navigate to Manage mode, and then to Tools | Database | Import | Database from the top menu bar.ĪCDSee supports Collections, Keywords, Ratings*, and Color Labels. Interesting…I thought based on the way ACDsee talk about importing the LR database here:. I guess they are not bad tools but you have to be extremely patient (and I am on a top of line Win 10 system). printing, web sharing (Lightroom doesn’t have this feature). Stacks being multiple version in a batch of images that was taken in quick succession (Lightroom has this), and Versions are multiple versions of the same imageas as in the RAW, TIFF, JPEG which you can then designate for different purposes e.g. The best thing these two DAM tools have is stacks AND versions. All nice tools but their UX is a mess, they look even more outdated than Lightroom, but more importantly, they crash all the time when doing batch operations. I also tried IMatch and just earlier today Photo Supreme. I also tried a lot of tools and Lightroom is probably the most convenient with DxO.
Acdsee for mac 4 trial, extend time trial#
With 1-year trial you can scan like 50,000 images for free. They dont’ write to the keywords, but to a specific plugin section of keywords so you can use them in search but they don’t export. Running this plugin to auto tag all my images using Google Vision. But one thing I am curious about is what is “Light Classic CC Free”? Is that the limited version of the trial once it expires? Thank you for these insights, and confirms my choice of staying with LR.
0 kommentar(er)
